Unherd article on economic rationalism, diversity and immigration

I have written a piece for the website Unherd about the way the alliance between  technocratic, free market liberalism and the politics of diversity over mass immigration - is a theme that crops up a few times in my book.

You can read the article here.

Comments

  1. Dave30 September 2018 at 05:54

    Very interesting.

    One thing I would like to tease out however is that while there can be ideological movements pushing these agendas (i.e. people who sincerely believe that they are correct and just), one should not discount the more realpolitik elements of pure power and deep corruption.

    Last night a friend and I had a look into the backgrounds of some of the people connected to Labour's grooming gang scandal.

    Take for example the former Director of Public Prosecutions (2003 to 2008) Lord Macdonald. Looks like a very suspect chap.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Macdonald

    ''As a junior barrister he defended a number of terrorist suspects (both Provisional IRA and those from the Middle East), fraudsters and major drug dealers, he was also on the defence team for the Matrix Churchill trial.[6] In the late 1990s, he was a co-founder of Matrix Chambers (a set of barristers' chambers specialising in human rights cases) with Cherie Booth and Tim Owen QC.[6] In 2001 he became a recorder (a part-time judge) in the Crown Court.[9]''

    Nice company he kept there... Good contacts to make. How does such a chap, at such a young age, having only been a part time judge, rise to DPP so quickly?

    ''The appointment was immediately denounced by Opposition spokesmen as "rampant cronyism" and a "provocative appointment" due to Macdonald's business relationship with Cherie Booth (wife of then Prime Minister Tony Blair) and his lack of prosecution experience.''

    His appointment was defended by the Lord Pannick, the man who was most concerned to overturn Britain's Primary Purpose Rule - which opened the floodgate for Muslim chain migration. https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/10356909?q&versionId=12055416

    So, obviously given what Peter McLoughlin's 'Easy Meat' uncovered and given the years of Macdonald's tenure above, there's no way Blair and his mafia didn't know about the rapes. My Greek friend even speculates that they were making money from the drugs side of the rape gangs, certainly their friends in the City were:
    http://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2011/04/money-laundering-and-the-moral-world-of-bankers/

    Either way, we are looking at another Clinton family crime syndicate.

    Macdonald's even got his nose in the Ukraine debacle: http://www.britishukrainiansociety.org/2015/11/19/1075

    You can see what David Malone thought about the British Ukrainian Society and its MI6 affiliated members here:
    http://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2014/05/british-interests-ukraine/

    Macdonald was also a first pupil of Helena Kennedy who is very closely connected to Common Purpose - the charity whose name keeps popping up in relation to inaction on the rape gangs.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helena_Kennedy,_Baroness_Kennedy_of_The_Shaws

    No wonder the big feminist has so little to say about the greatest scandal in English social history.

    We clearly need to start draining our own swamp.

    At some point we will also need to reappraise the appointment of Keir Starmer as Macdonald's successor (2008-2013). Clearly the English Defence League was forcing the hand of the authorities during this period so can we view his tenure as an attempt to do something about the rape gangs but not too much?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dave30 September 2018 at 05:55

    And, separately but relatedly, we also turned up some interesting facts about Peter Tatchell

    https://www.scotsman.com/lifestyle/a-cause-for-all-seasons-1-600664

    ''Seven years after dodging the draft, Tatchell applied for an officer’s commission in the Royal Artillery, underwent training in artillery and tank warfare and was offered a place at Sandhurst. He turned it down, since he was actually researching a book on the class-ridden, anti-democratic, imperialist culture of the British armed forces. But a few years later he was lecturing at Sandhurst and other military institutions on his strategy of non-nuclear "defensive defence".''

    https://www.newstatesman.com/node/157332

    ''What do I know about military matters? Not much. But in 1985 I wrote a book on military history and theory, Democratic Defence, which was commended by senior officers at Sandhurst and Camberley. I also occasionally lectured there during the 1980s. Indeed, I was offered a place at Sandhurst. When I turned it down, because of my objection to the war in Ireland, the commanding officer of the Royal Artillery urged me to reconsider. He suggested, somewhat improbably, that I was potential General Staff material.''

    You don't get into military establishments without being part of the deep State. I mean how else has the man managed to fund a life of ''human rights activism'' for free?

    And now that Vice President Mike Pence is speaking to anti-LGBT conferences, (https://www.newsweek.com/mike-pence-becomes-first-vp-address-anti-gay-summit-1137498), I think we need to be clear that gay rights and the LGBT agenda are two different things. The former is about dignity, the latter is about dissolving society in the interests of finance capital. Trump's renouncement of globalisation means things are going into reverse.

    As such we also see that Rees Mogg is coming out for the traditional family https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/09/28/rees-mogg-public-policy-discriminates-family-encourages-breakdown/

    and that Breitbart (a Trump-Bannon front) and Katie Hopkins (who has links to the Trump team) are reporting on drug trafficking
    https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/09/29/1566-pounds-of-heroin-found-in-iranian-trucks-entering-eu-from-turkey/

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjFzckAimPI

    No wonder fakes like Ian Bone (another man who has never worked) are ''harassing'' the likes of Mogg. Gives the State permission to issue personal security to controversial politicians. https://order-order.com/2018/09/12/police-called-moggs-children-nanny-ambushed-leftist-protest-outside-home/

    I think we can expect 2019 to start getting very interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous7 October 2018 at 17:02

    In addition to poor white boys and men, another identity group locked out of the system of diversity: whither the outrage about the rise in attacks on the elderly (most of whom I bet are white)?

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1009308/violence-against-elderly-soars-to-new-high

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6108191/Violent-attacks-elderly-three-times-likely-just-ten-years-ago.html

    Even the Guardian saw fit to cover it. Which I think is somewhat ironic since they and the rest of the liberal class have held the elderly responsible for Brexit.

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/apr/20/decline-in-violent-ends-as-attacks-against-older-people-rise

    Indeed, given the bile that has been hurled against our older citizens, who, along with children, are surely our most vulnerable people, is it beyond the bounds of logic to suggest that this incessant propaganda hasn't in some way contributed to this increase in sickening attacks?

    Which other group in society could face such violence and with barely a murmur (for the issue has quickly fallen out of sight) from the government or media? If you think the elderly have no place in the hierarchy of victimhood, you'd be right as the government has confirmed that age will not be a protected characteristic for hate crimes.

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1016854/uk-crime-elderly-people-vulnerable-target-fraud-attacks-hate-crime

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

All comments, however critical, will be accepted as long as they are not personal and/or abusive.

Popular posts from this blog

Schopenhauer on Hegel: "A flat-headed, insipid, nauseating, illiterate charlatan."

There's nothing like a good insult or two, and if you're looking for insults in philosophy, you need look no further than Arthur Schopenhauer's comments on his German contemporary, the much more popular and successful Friedrich Hegel.  Schopenhauer suggested as a motto of Hegel’s philosophy some words of Shakespeare: ‘s uch stuff as madmen tongue and brain not’. He added : " Hegel, installed from above, by the powers that be, as the certified Great Philosopher, was a flat-headed, insipid, nauseating, illiterate charlatan, who reached the pinnacle of audacity in scribbling together and dishing up the craziest mystifying nonsense. This nonsense has been noisily proclaimed as immortal wisdom by mercenary followers and readily accepted as such by all fools, who thus joined into as perfect a chorus of admiration as had ever been heard before. The extensive field of spiritual influence with which Hegel was furnished by those in power has enabled him to ac...
Read more

Why Islamists and feminists avoid confronting each other

Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of our system of diversity is the way feminists and Islamists avoid directly confronting each other. Their ideologies are utterly opposed to each other, but within the system they are allies, so maintain distance and attack others. We can see this in how feminists resolutely avoid picking up on specifically Islamic-related instances of actual misogyny and discrimination in action. They nearly always stick to generalities and abstractions about the world or society as a whole, as Fawcett Society chief executive Sam Smethers does in telling Owen Jones that , “We have a very misogynistic culture in the UK.” In this version of reality, there is a single culture – or at least all the cultures we have come from the same root - and it is ‘very misogynistic’. This is the ‘patriarchy’ theory that is remarkably popular in the upper echelons of the liberal-left, just as it is among young feminists coming out of their Gender Studies courses at universit...
Read more

Immigration: our public debate misses the main point

Our public debate on immigration in Britain almost always focuses entirely on money and thereby misses the main point, a point that our political-media class finds difficult to deal with and that many regard as almost illegitimate. This is how people feel . It is emblematic of the state of democracy in Britain that any sort of negative opinions about immigration routinely get shouted down and lambasted as ‘wrong’ by the siren voices of people and institutions, most of which are on the supposedly ‘liberal-left’ side of politics. It is particularly disturbing the way that anyone who talks about negative effects of immigration is routinely attacked (often by hordes of lefty people on Twitter) as ‘racist’. These voices have a huge and in my view poisonous impact on the debate, forcing anyone who wants to make some nuanced points about immigration and identity into defending themselves against charges of racism, which is well established as one of the the worst offences one...
Read more